Rockstars Who Shockingly Hated Their Own Albums

By Jack Ripley | May 31, 2023

Prince – 'The Black Album'

Not every hit album is revered by the artists who recorded them. Some of the most popular and important albums of the '70s, '80s, and '90s are downright hated by the bands who made them happen. Many of us remember these albums from their release, and they became part of our musical identity. However, unbeknownst to many fans, some of these albums were not held in high esteem by the very artists who created them.

From David Bowie to Metallica, these albums range in genre and era, but all share the commonality of being loved by fans and loathed by their creators. Join us as we take a closer look at these iconic albums and the reasons behind the artists' disdain. Don't miss out on this inside look into the music industry's most controversial albums.

test article image
(getty images)

Prince was known for his innovative and boundary-pushing music, but his 1987 album, The Black Album, was a bridge too far for the legendary musician. Convinced that the album was evil and the product of a malevolent force known as Spooky Electric, Prince refused to release it despite its intended audience, the black community.

Originally intended as a follow-up to his masterpiece, Sign O' The Times, The Black Album was marketed as The Funk Bible in press releases, but Prince's spiritual awakening caused him to reconsider. Though bootlegs of the album began to circulate and sell for large amounts of money, Prince refused to budge. It wasn't until 1994, when his label Warner Bros. released a limited edition version of the album, that it saw the light of day.

However, even with its limited release, Prince maintained a distance from the "haunted" record, leaving it to languish in relative obscurity compared to his other works. Despite Prince's reservations, The Black Album has become a sought-after artifact for his fans and a testament to the musician's uncompromising artistic vision.

The Beatles, 'Let It Be'

test article image
(getty images)

The Beatles may have been the biggest band in the world, but they were not immune to criticism. Their final album, Let It Be, was released in 1970, after a series of disappointing recording sessions. The band united with Phil Spector, known for his “Wall of Sound” production technique, for what would be their swansong. However, the album was met with mixed reviews at best. Critics called it a “cardboard tombstone” and questioned Spector’s suitability as a producer.

The recording of Let It Be was a tumultuous time for the band, leading to tensions that would eventually prove irreparable. John Lennon spoke candidly about the experience in a Rolling Stone interview after the band’s breakup, calling it “miserable” and citing it as a contributing factor to the band’s dissolution. He even went so far as to say that he and George Harrison were fed up with being “side-men” for Paul McCartney.

The cracks created by Let It Be persisted long after the band’s breakup. The surviving Beatles remained unhappy with the orchestral extras that Spector had added to the album. In 2003, McCartney spearheaded a remixed version of the album, known as Let It Be… Naked, which removed the controversial strings. McCartney’s revisionist approach to the album demonstrated that even decades later, the Beatles were not immune to a bit of revisionism themselves.